5 Replies Latest reply: May 26, 2013 1:05 AM by NEWBIE555 RSS

Reallocate and WAFL Scans, Active_Redirect status

mbonneau79 Certified Sprinter
Currently Being Moderated

Hello all,


So I've been watching our disk space shrink over time, and I ran an IOmeter test on one or our virtual machines whose VMDK resides in a VMFS datastore on a VMware-formatted LUN in a flexvol. The results were abysmal for random operations, far lower than even lesser arrays.


This is on a new Dell Poweredge R610 (dual 6-core 2.8Ghz, 96GB RAM) host with a dual-port QLogic 2462 (running ESXi 4.1 update 1 with ALUA-enabled igroups and MPIO settings configured by the Virtual Storage Console) connected through Cisco MDS9124's - so everything in between the host and the storage is very capable, results like I've seen should not be happening.


I decided to do a wafl scan measure_layout on one of my VMFS datastores to see what was going on, and the ratio was 4.93, expected was 1.32.


Based on that information, I decided to perform a volume reallocation using the reallocate start -f -p /vol/[volname] command.


It completed after a number of hours (the datastore is a terabyte in size) and I reran the wafl scan measure_layout command, and the ratio had dropped to 2.93. Progress!


I then ran a reallocate measure -o /vol/[volname] and it gave me a result of 2, which should be fairly optimized.


All's good at this point, except all of the volumes in the aggregate containing the VMFS datastore are showing "redirect" status, even the aggregate itself is showing "redirect". The VMFS datastore itself is still showing "active_redirect" status.


I ran a wafl scan status command and now it's showing all volumes on the filer in question (even volumes in another aggregate) as performing "active bitmap rearrangement".


The other aggregate and it's volumes do not show "redirect" status.


My questions are:


Will the "redirect" and "active_redirect" statuses go away once the wafl scan is completed, since the system shows no reallocations running?


Can I run more volume reallocations even if the volume (and the containing aggregate) itself is in "redirect" status?


Should I reallocate all of the volumes in this aggregate (since it's at 81% used <gasp>) then perform an aggregate reallocation to ensure volumes are spread evenly across all spindles and free space is available in large, contiguous chunks?





More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...


  • Correct Answers - 10 points
  • Helpful Answers - 5 points