The arrival of FCoE makes it possible to meet all your storage and LAN networking needs with a single Ethernet fabric. However, it may also create some confusion because now you have both iSCSI and FCoE as viable options for Ethernet SANs. In the June issue of Tech OnTap, Silvano Gai of Cisco and Mike McNarmara of NetApp wrote an article that describes the differences between the two protocols with some guidelines for when you might choose one versus the other. They go on to discuss a variety of deployment scenarios and indicate which protocol is most appropriate for each scenario.
You can check out the article at http://www.netapp.com/us/communities/tech-ontap/tot-fcoe-iscsi-0906.html
What are your plans for FCoE? Given a choice, would you opt for FCoE or iSCSI? In what scenarios?
FCoE sounds great but the price $$$!
Also not sure the tools are ready to manage FCoE just yet so will give it 12 months and then review.
Bren
FCoE sounds like a very neat idea. The problem is it is really bleeding edge at the moment.
Although FCoE standard on its own has been ratified, the trick is it cannot run on top of just any Ethernet infrastructure. And this is the second part of standarisation equation: Enhanced Ethernet (or Data Center Ethernet) quite likely will not be fully ratified within next year (with key features like true QoS & pause propagation).
So for the time being, in real-life implementations iSCSI has an obvious edge (although technically & conceptually inferior to FCoE).
Regards,
Radek
Just to add in another perspective to this perspective.....
http://blog.scottlowe.org/2009/06/30/thinking-out-loud-why-deploy-fcoe/
The multihop thing was new to me (and very good to know).